J L Williams Consultancy Limited

Excellence though Partnership

Sunday, 05 September 2010
The News
First wave of 32 new-style academies open this week PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sean Coughlan BBC News education correspondent   
Thursday, 02 September 2010 11:14

Click to play

David Hampson of Grimsby's Tollbar Academy takes Tom Symonds on a tour of his schools

There will be 32 schools opening this term as new-style academies in England.

The number was labelled a "failure" by teachers' unions - while the Education Secretary Michael Gove said he was "quite encouraged".

These were outstanding schools which have taken up the government's offer to opt out of local authority control and become independent academies.

Among the 32 schools, seven are primary schools, the first academies for this age group.

There are a further 110 schools which will convert to academies later - including about 40 primary schools.

This group of schools aiming for academy status also includes a number of grammar schools.

Lack of numbers

Academies are state-funded independent schools which will receive direct funding, outside of the control or support of local authorities.

Mr Gove said the greater independence would help schools to raise standards.

"This will give heads more power to tackle disruptive children, to protect and reward teachers better, and to give children the specialist teaching they need," he said.

Shadow Education Secretary Ed Balls said the "tiny fraction" of schools becoming academies represented a "further embarrassment for Michael Gove".

David Hampson, principal of Tollbar Business and Enterprise College in Grimbsy, which is expecting to become an academy later this year, said schools would profit from the greater autonomy.

"The benefits of becoming an academy will be enormous - less bureaucracy certainly but also more resources which we ourselves will be able to manage," he said.

But Christine Blower, head of the National Union of Teachers, rejected claims that they would raise standards - and said the low take-up showed the idea had failed to catch the imagination of schools.

There are more than 20,000 state schools in England.

"For a policy that was supposed to be a flagship change for education, it is something of a failure to have so few schools opening at this stage," she said.

First wave

These 142 schools, opening this week or later in the year, will be the first wave of a new type of academy.

Christine Blower Christine Blower says the new-style academies have not "caught the imagination"

Under the previous Labour government academies were focused on improving areas of underachievement - with academies having outside sponsors and high-profile buildings.

There are still so-called "traditional" academies opening under this policy - with 64 opening this term.

But the coalition has changed the direction of the academy programme - inviting the most successful schools to take on this independent status, operating outside the local authority.

Among the biggest regional groupings of proposed new academies are in Kent, Essex, Barnet and Lincolnshire. There are also a significant number of grammar schools among the new-style academies.

The principle of schools opting out to take academy status has been strongly criticised by Chris Keates, leader of the NASUWT teachers' union.

"The idea that a handful of governors or an individual head teacher can make such a serious and irreversible decision without having consulted fully with staff, parents and the local community will shock all right-minded people."

Schools taking academy status will become independent schools, with their assets becoming the responsibility of trusts, which will be run as charitable companies.

Last Updated on Thursday, 02 September 2010 11:17
 
BSF was not just about schools PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joey Gardiner Building.co.uk   
Friday, 16 July 2010 11:10

The axing of 735 projects has wreaked havoc on 735 communities, 26 in one city alone. That city is Liverpool, which stands to be £410m poorer as a result of the cancellation. So where does that leave deprived areas such as Croxteth?

Ask people involved in Liverpool’s Building Schools for the Future programme for their reaction to the news that 26 schools in the city have been scrapped and the most common response is “devastated”. Followed pretty swiftly by “angry”. “Physically sick” was how Liberal Democrat former council leader Warren Bradley summed it up.

These sentiments are echoed by the children of St John Bosco Catholic girls’ school, who have spent the past year and a half helping the council, developers and architects work up plans. Jane Corbett, the council’s education cabinet member, met the children of the BSF sample school last week. “They said: ’Jane, how can the government destroy young people’s dreams just like that?’” she reports. “I didn’t know how to answer them.”

It’s not just the children who are upset, though they would have been the main beneficiaries of the £350m public investment in the city. Contractors Morgan Sindall and Balfour Beatty, who were both leading bids for the work, are the others who will most obviously lose out. But Liverpool, which could have gained 1,000 jobs through the scheme, also serves as a microcosm of exactly how the cancellation of the £55bn BSF programme - announced last week by education secretary Michael Gove - will hit. It isn’t just an education problem or a construction industry problem; it affects whole communities.

‘So much work has gone in’

Since the shooting of 11-year-old Rhys Jones on the Croxteth Park estate in 2007, that area of Liverpool has been a national byword for deprivation and poverty. Much of the area falls in the top 5% of the most deprived neighbourhoods in the country.

Despite this, the story of St John Bosco, one of the schools that serves the area, is not one of failure. According to the Department for Education, it is in the top five schools in the city and has an energetic head who’s worked hard to turn it around.

It is, however, made up of a mish-mash of buildings from the fifties and sixties and has many physical problems, including a decaying frontage that had threatened to collapse. In an area that has well above average childhood obesity, it doesn’t help that it has cramped and dismal sports facilities. Anne Pontifex, head of the school, says: “This is one of the most deprived areas, and we have gun and knife crime going on. We wanted to build something that was going to be open to the community.”

Under wave six of the BSF programme, it was chosen as a sample school to determine the design of all 26 schools in the city - and was promised a £24m new school itself.

The time already invested in this process is frightening, and goes some way to explaining the anger. Pontifex says there have been at least three four-hour meetings each week for the past 18 months, all of them involving three or more members of staff. Initially they also included Partnerships for Schools, council planners and US architect Scott Prisco to develop the sample school, latterly the two bidding consortiums and their designers. This is on top of the council-commissioned planning process, run by Taylor Young, and work to merge the maintenance regime for all the schools.

Both consortiums, having been working since April, were due to submit their bids for the first phase of the scheme last Friday, but hadn’t reached the vital preferred bidder stage. Then came Gove’s announcement. All that work, it seems, was for nothing. One of the St John Bosco students, 15-year-old Lynsey Campbell, says: “The whole school was devastated - so much work has gone in. The politicians told us we could have it, and then they took it away for nothing.”

BSF: The political fall-out

Simon Hughes, deputy leader, Liberal Democrat party
“It would be a nonsense to take money that could be used for improving existing schools to create new schools … The will of the local community is for existing schools to continue.”

Steve Eling, deputy leader, Sandwell council (Labour)
“There is now going to be a two-tier education system in Sandwell. Pupils at these schools now find themselves attending schools that are not only in desperate need of renovation or rebuilding, but are far behind other schools in the area in terms of quality.”

Ian Liddell-Grainger, Tory MP for Bridgwater and West Somerset
“When you’ve spent all this time through the education system and the council and others to build up these schools to what they are, people have a right to come to the prime minister and the Cabinet to say, ’Can we please have a chat?’”

Tom Watson, Labour MP for West Bromwich
“He [Gove] is a miserable pipsqueak of a man.”

Liverpool’s loss

The council’s Labour leader, Joe Anderson, estimates the total lost investment to the city is £410.5m. He says: “It is not just our children’s education that is being put at risk; there is a huge knock-on effect for the local economy at a time when the construction industry is crying out for contracts.”

The council is leading a delegation to London to try and persuade ministers to reconsider, but most think it is unlikely that anything can be done. Former leader Bradley is lobbying his party leader, Nick Clegg, to try and get the policy changed.

Graham Shennan, managing director of Morgan Sindall, says: “Clearly this is devastating news for pupils, teachers, parents and the local Liverpool economy.”

Morgan Sindall already employs 108 local people in other education projects in the city, with 80% of those on its sites coming from within the borough of Liverpool. The proposed BSF programme is about six times that size, which gives some idea of the likely impact on local jobs and skills.

Shennan won’t say how much the firm has already spent on the bid, but one consultant on it estimates each contractor could have parted with anything up to £1m.

Shed KM, one of the architects working with Morgan Sindall, was working through the weekend to finalise the bid, in what turned out to be the final hours before Gove’s announcement. Hazel Rounding, a director at the firm, says: “We’d just started to get a real relationship with the client. I just feel terrible for the school.”

The cold, hard reality is that Shed could have gone on to design five or six of the 26 schools if Morgan Sindall had succeeded. The chance of that work is now gone.

One of the reasons Shed - not a known school architect - was involved in the bid was because of its former work in redesigning the grade II-listed Littlewoods building for developer Urban Splash. This iconic building, in Edge Lane to the east of the city centre, has latterly become a flagship part of the BSF programme. When Splash’s prospective buyer for the scheme dropped out, the council decided to combine two schools on the site, thereby making the BSF wave a key part of regeneration plans in the city.

Eleanor Benson is head of one of the schools, St Hilda’s CE high school. “For us this was a once-in-a-generation chance to get proper facilities. But it was also solving a lot of problems, and fitted coherently into a regeneration plan for the city. We’re very angry and frustrated.”

For a city such as Liverpool, which has battled for years with a falling population - just 400,000 people live there, compared with 700,000 in its heyday - rebuilding the schools was just one part of a wider strategy to turn it around. Any estate agent will tell you how important good schools are to the strength of an area’s housing market, making new-build development more likely. Corbett says: “If businesses know we’ve got top-quality schools, then we can attract people, and we can retain the graduates who currently leave here after university.”

Look at this wider picture and it is not just in BSF funding that potential investment is haemorrhaging. The city’s housing market renewal scheme is facing a cut of up to 18% in its £51m annual funding. And the North West Development Agency, which invested £32.5m in construction projects in the city last year, is facing the axe.

As St John Bosco’s Campbell says, it is these wider impacts that are the most fundamental. “Croxteth isn’t that much of a bad place, but it’s got a bad name. We needed BSF to bring people in and see it’s not really that bad.”

Liverpool is only one example. The BSF cuts will be having this kind of impact on development in every community they hit. Education is just the start.

Liverpool BSF in numbers

  • Schools to go ahead 8
  • Schools under review 2
  • Schools to be scrapped 26
  • Estimated construction value of scrapped schools £350m
  • Amount council has spent working up scheme: between £3m (according to the council) and £7m (according to former council leader Warren Bradley)
  • Amount spent by contractors: unknown, estimated at least £500,000 each
  • Number of apprentices who would have been employed 300
  • Number of planning permissions achieved for schemes now scrapped 5
Last Updated on Friday, 16 July 2010 11:13
 
Cameron on BSF cuts from BBC news PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 16 July 2010 11:06

Cameron says axing school buildings plan 'unpopular'

Education Secretary Michael Gove
David Cameron has acknowledged axing school building projects is not "easy" nor "popular" as the political row over the government's plans has continued.

The prime minister said the decision was necessary because of the financial "mess" left by Labour and its failure to be open about where cuts would fall.

Some Tory MPs say they are worried about the impact in their local areas.

A Lib Dem minister said the coalition's "credibility" may be at risk if alternative funds are not found.

The government has been under growing fire since Education Secretary Michael Gove's announcement earlier this week that more than 700 projects would not go ahead under the previous government's Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme in England.

'Difficult decision'

But the Department for Education's list of 1,500 projects which were either going ahead, being axed or being reviewed contained 25 mistakes and Mr Gove was forced to apologise to schools which had been wrongly informed.

Speaking at a school in Cornwall, Mr Cameron said the decision to discontinue the schemes had been "very difficult" but blamed the previous government for planning 50% cuts in capital expenditure without giving any details of where.

Start Quote

That is not easy and I know it is not popular.”

End Quote David Cameron Prime Minister on axing school buildings projects

"We have come in, we have inherited this situation," he said. "Half of the school projects will go ahead but half of them can't go ahead.

"We have had to announce what those are. Now that is not easy and I know it is not popular. But it is because Labour government left the country in such a complete mess, with the biggest budget deficit in the G20."

He stressed "this does not mean we cannot have more money going in for future schools and we can do that but it does mean we had to say very clearly these projects cannot go ahead because there isn't any money".

Two Tory MPs - Ian Liddell-Grainger and Gordon Henderson - have expressed concerns about the impact of the plans about schools in their constituencies and said they are considering lobbying ministers over the issue.

'Real need'

And Lib Dem MP Nick Harvey - who is armed forces minister in the coalition - has written to Mr Gove to urge a speedy review of alternative sources of funding for schools which have lost out.

Start Quote

It is important for the morale of the students, staff, governors and the wider community that the real and obvious need for these buildings to be replaced is acknowledged”

End Quote Nick Harvey Lib Dem MP

"I accept that putting these projects on hold in light of the current deficit, or pending a review of how to achieve best value from such a programme, can be justified but that does not mean that the basic problem of inadequate school buildings disappears," he wrote.

Mr Harvey said it was important for the morale of pupils, teachers and local communities that the "real and obvious" need for new buildings was acknowledged and "alternative mechanisms put in place at the earliest practical moment".

He added: "I also think that such a course of action is important to the credibility of the government, as unnecessary delay will only breed an atmosphere of cynicism."

'Botched'

Shadow Education Secretary Ed Balls has called on Mr Gove to withdraw the "error-strewn" list of building projects, saying he had spotted a further four errors and that parents could no longer have "confidence" in it.

He also called on MPs to investigate the chain of events which led to its publication.

"This is a botched and thoughtless announcement caused by the government's desire to rush through deep cuts to frontline services," he said.

The BBC's Political Editor Nick Robinson said the row over the school building cuts was the tip of the iceberg in relation to unease about the prospect of future 25% proposed cuts in department budgets.

The leader of the Liberal Democrats in Liverpool has said the party could be "wiped out" within five years due to its association with decisions taken by the coalition government.

Councillor Warren Bradley said cutting the building programme was "abhorrent" and could turn voters away from the party.

Last Updated on Friday, 16 July 2010 11:10
 
Article from PPP Journal PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Williams   
Monday, 28 September 2009 16:56

Feature Story

Trust schools, BSF and PFI – where's the fit?

Trust schools, BSF and PFI – where's the fit?Graham Shaw, Senior Solicitor, Schofield Sweeney Projects Team explains the meaning of trust schools and where they fit within PFI

Recently the Government's trust school vision became a reality as the first trust schools opened their doors to pupils, staff, parents and local communities. Given that this changes the landscape of local education provision, we need to understand how this will impact on those forms of education provision that feature across the sector, most notably the Government's flagship Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme and schools PFI.

Before we can examine the fit between trust schools, BSF and schools PFI, we first need to understand what we mean by a trust school. In this regard, our starting point is the Education and Inspections Act 2006 (EIA), which, ironically, makes no use of the trust school phrase but describes the process of becoming a trust school as 'the acquisition by a foundation or a foundation special school of a foundation established otherwise than under the [School Standards and Framework Act 1998]' (which, until the EIA, was the conventional way for a foundation school to acquire a foundation). As such, a 'trust school' is a foundation school (whether primary, secondary or special) and part of the local authority family of maintained schools, receiving its own delegated budget and, like any other foundation school, employing its staff and setting its own admissions criteria.

Insofar as the foundation is concerned, this holds the school land on trust for the school and appoints foundation governors to the school governing body just as with any other foundation school. However, unlike foundations acquired by other foundation schools, it can also have other wider objects and, as such, be involved in other activities such as regeneration and wider service provision although all such activities must be charitable given that the foundation will be constituted as a company limited by guarantee (each member 'guaranteeing' its liability up to 10 pounds) and registered as a charity with the charity commission. In this regard, the members of the foundation may be drawn from the charitable, voluntary, further education, higher education and business sectors, the participating schools and the local authority (as commissioner and partner) and will normally reflect the objects and activities of the foundation.

Now we have established what is meant by a trust school, we can more sensibly look at the implications for BSF and schools PFI, and how these programmes will work together. In this regard, the key issue to consider is how the capital funding will work where a trust school is to benefit from new or refurbished premises.

Under BSF this is straightforward given that the Government already fully funds capital costs for all other foundation and voluntary-aided schools. As such, we can be confident that the Government will do likewise for trust schools.

We can also be confident the Government will fully fund capital costs under PFI, even though it only provides 90% capital funding for voluntary-aided schools, since capital costs for all other foundation schools are fully funded and it would be nonsensical to differentiate between trust and other foundation schools on this basis.

Aside from capital funding, the trust school and its foundation will both need to be named in any Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) notice for a new BSF or PFI scheme to comply with procurement law. Once the private sector partner has been selected, the trust school and its foundation will then be required to contract with the local authority on the same basis as a voluntary-aided school.

Under PFI, this will involve the trust school entering into a Governing Body Agreement to surrender the delegated budget to the local authority to fund the PFI and provide the trust school with input into design development, phasing, decanting, inspection and third party use.

Where premises are to be refurbished or provided under BSF using a PFI contract, the trust school will again enter into a Governing Body Agreement with the local authority on a similar basis. However, if the scheme will form part of a later phase, the trust school and the foundation will also enter into a Procurement Agreement with the local authority whereby the local authority will agree to develop the design requirements for the trust school with the Local Education Partnership (LEP) in accordance with the Strategic Partnering Agreement.

In circumstances where the trust school will be built under BSF using a design and build contract but will form part of a later phase, the trust school and its foundation will again enter into a Procurement Agreement with the local authority on a similar basis. Whether or not the scheme will be a sample project or form part of a later phase, they will also enter into a Development Agreement with the local authority to govern design development and other matters between the local authority (on behalf of the trust school and foundation) and the LEP. Once the new premises are practically complete, the trust school will then assume the rights and obligations of the local authority in the design and build contract with LEP by operation of a Deed of Novation with the local authority.

In the above we have contemplated what will happen where an existing trust school is to have its premises refurbished or reprovided under a new BSF or PFI scheme but not looked at the implications for an existing BSF or PFI project where a school chooses to become a trust school under the EIA. As such, we need to consider what will happen in these circumstances to complete the landscape of future education provision.

As we now know, a trust school is a foundation school supported by a foundation acquired under the EIA, which holds the school land on trust for the school. A school, which becomes a trust school, will therefore need to change from a community or voluntary school (where it is not already a foundation school) and there will need to be a transfer of title in the school land to the new foundation. In a PFI scheme (whether pursuant to BSF or as a stand-alone project), this will be achieved by an authority change. Similarly, under a BSF design and build contract, this will be treated in the same way as an authority change.

Under BSF (using PFI or design and build) and a stand-alone PFI, the authority change will also need to capture the revised contractual arrangements, which will be required to reflect the above requirements. The extent to which these arrangements will be relevant will depend on whether we are dealing with PFI or design and build, and whether the scheme is still in procurement (and, if so, how far this has progressed).

Earlier I enquired about the fit between trust schools, BSF and PFI given that the impact on the education landscape of the trust schools programme could have major implications for Government investment in the refurbishment of the entire schools estate. The answer to this query, as demonstrated above, is that there is a clear fit between trust schools and BSF and PFI on the key issues of capital funding, procurement and contract structure. As such, the real test for the Government is not how well the pieces of the jigsaw fit together but whether the trust school programme will deliver step change in educational attainment. Given PricewaterhouseCooper's generally positive 4th annual report on academies, itself the sister scheme to the trust school programme, the future looks bright for trust schools in this regard.
Last Updated on Monday, 28 September 2009 16:57
 
New builds 'fall down' on SEN facilities PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 25 September 2009 20:12
  Published in The TES on 25 September, 2009 | By: Kerra Maddern

 

Doors too narrow for wheelchairs and duff acoustics in classrooms for the deaf show that guidlines are being flouted

Many newly built schools are failing disabled pupils because regulations on classroom quality are not strict enough, campaigners have claimed.

Many of the buildings - often procured through Building Schools for the Future (BSF) - suffer from failed acoustics in classrooms designed for the deaf and doors that are not wide enough for wheelchair use, according to the Alliance for Inclusive Education (Allfie).

Guidance from the Department for Children, Schools and Families on catering for disabled children is detailed - but it is not statutory, and the charity warns that too many BSF contractors are able to ignore it.

The charity is calling on the DCSF to let independent disability experts review BSF policy, and for ministers to introduce new statutory duties to promote equality in new primary and secondaries.

Simone Aspis, Allfie campaigns and policy co-ordinator, said: "There needs to be a review of the whole process so that schools are accessible for everyone. We are all supposed to be working in the context of promoting equality, but this is not happening in practice with BSF."

Allfie wants there to be consultation with disabled children before building projects start - something which, the charity has found, has not happened at all in the UK.

"It is unlikely that a school's learning environment will be accessible if disabled people with access expertise are not involved at the design stage.

"This would include consideration being given to environmental barriers such as room layout, lighting and acoustics," Ms Aspis said.

"It is only when construction work on a new school is well under way that any shortcomings in accessibility for disabled pupils will become apparent.

"Too often, this is because disabled access auditors have not been involved in the planning stage."

Ms Aspis has written to Partnerships for Schools, which runs BSF, to ask if they have completed any research about what disabled children and their parents think about projects, but has so far not had a response.

Ty Goddard, chief executive of the British Council for School Environments, said he would support a review of BSF if it improved access for everybody.

"We know there seems to be issues around disabled children being able to fully access all areas of our schools," he said.

"This of course means it also affects non-disabled children and adults. We know that if you get access right for disabled people, you get it pretty much right for everybody."

Last Updated on Friday, 25 September 2009 20:14
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

Copyright © J L Williams Consultancy Limited 2009-2010.
Registered in England and Wales Company Number 7345875. VAT Number 8682164 00. Registered Office: 45 Falstone Road, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, B73 6PJ.